Noteworthy
IAM Mourns Union Icon Phil Zannella 

Phillip M. Zannella, Sr. one of the Machinists UnionÕs most veteran and respected labor leaders in Ohio, died September 15, in his home in Highland Heights.

"Phil was the most dedicated trade unionist I have ever known," said IAM President Tom Buffenbarger. "He was an authentic blue-collar leader, full of compassion and determination to advance the cause of American workers. He was tireless in his efforts. He was my friend and teacher, and I will miss him."

Zannella joined the Machinists in 1946 as an auto mechanic at a Cleveland-area Ford dealership. He held offices in Local 1363, District 54, the Ohio State Council of Machinists and the Ohio AFL-CIO.

Zannella spent his entire union career in Ohio. "He loved his union," Buffenbarger adds, "but he also loved his state and his community." 
Zannella is survived by Ruth, his wife of 55 years; a daughter Gloria; a son, Phillip, Jr., a District 54 business representative in Cleveland and chairman of the IAM's law committee; eight grandchildren and several brothers.

"He was an authentic blue-collar leader, full of compassion and determination to advance the cause of American workers," said Buffenbarger.



Members Stay Tough at Illinois Forge

Local 1988 members at Illinois Forge are standing tough. During the rough times in the 1980’s, they sacrificed to keep their company going. After profits took off in the 1990’s, management turned its back on employees. During contract negotiations, they proposed reducing vacation, providing fewer health benefits but higher premiums, canceling retiree life insurance and a 2 percent wage increase for the entire three-year agreement. 

Such unfair demands led to 100% member support for a strike. Now, more than 15 months later Local 1988 members are still 100% strong. “We’re going to get this strike settled. These members are tremendous. They deserve it,” said Midwest GVP Alex Bay.


Buffenbarger Speaks out for Missile Defense

On July 20, 2001 International President Tom Buffenbarger addressed the National Press Club to outline the IAM’s support of a National Missile Defense (NMD) program. In the following excerpt from his address, Buffenbarger says a long-range and bi-partisan approach to deploying NMD is “an opportunity to protect the cities of America.”:

Missile technology today is a genie that is out of the bottle. … Thirty-five nations around the world are now known to possess some form of ballistic missile -- and most of the others, no doubt, know where to buy them. At least ten countries in the world possess chemical or biological weapons --- and one of the terrible truths of our times is that weapons of this kind are not all that hard to make. 

At least eight countries are known to have nuclear weapons. Between three and five others are knocking on the door. And if it’s true what we hear about what’s been going on in the former Soviet Union, then who knows what in the way of weapons and fissionable materials may reach ---or have reached already --- the international black market. 

Listen --- I mentioned to you before the name of Timothy Mc Veigh. This was a guy, who with calculation and great malice, committed a horrible, unspeakable atrocity. 
But Mc Veigh was an American -- a Catholic kid from a blue collar family in Buffalo. Whatever the crazy place he wound up, the guy started out in life exposed to a set of values that we all understand, honor and respect.

Out in the world as it is today, there are a lot of folks who don’t start with values like ours. There are people -- people who run or will run countries and major movements -- who start out where Mc Veigh wound up. And if they don’t have such things already, they soon may be able get their hands on really terrible weapons -- and on the missiles to deliver them on American targets. 
Which of our cities might be the target? Would it be Anchorage? Honolulu? Seattle? Portland? San Francisco? Los Angeles? Do you think that this is far-fetched? Improbable? Who, you might ask, would be crazy enough to risk his or her own personal survival? 

The surviving crew members of the U.S.S. Cole know the answer. So do the parents of the twenty-odd Israeli teenagers who went out dancing one night not long ago and never came home. What I am saying to you is that we are no longer dealing with predictable threats. 

The Soviet Union was a truly nasty regime -- and a ruthless one to boot. I, for one, rejoiced to see it go away. But in a strategic sense, the USSR was a known quantity. It had leaders who were cautious and who were interested in this world, not the next. They understood what weapons of mass destruction really are. And in their own sphere, they were in complete control. 
For better or for worse, that’s not the world in which we live today. It is not the world in which our children and grandchildren will be growing up. Seven. Ten. Fifteen years from now, they will face graver and more unpredictable threats. 

So, to my Democratic friends on Capitol Hill, I would urge them to forego the short-term, tactical, partisan advantage. I know how easy it would be to craft a maze of budgetary and diplomatic obstacles that could stall development of a national missile defense. But can our party really afford to be seen as weak on the defense of America’s cities? I think not. I hope my party’s leaders will come to agree with me. 

And, to those Republicans whose anti-union credentials are impeccable, I would urge you to go slow. Speed is not the imperative here. The successful defense of America’s cities is. In your haste to win political points, you may jeopardize the entire missile defense program. And that would be a travesty. 
 

Contents